The
Importance of Place in Public Space Design
Rachel Carr, 2020 Cohort
Don’t get me wrong, the new main branch of the Dayton Metro Library is wonderful. It’s bright, innovative, and inviting. Mostly, it’s well suited for Dayton. This last aspect is something that I hadn’t felt until I visited another city’s new central library in Austin, Texas. It’s easy to see the beauty of the Austin Public Library, and want all of its features for the Dayton Public Library without much thought about the important differences between the cities.
The Austin Public Library Central Branch is more than bright. It’s a 6 story vibrant sanctuary, with a “technology petting zoo,” listening stations, and three outdoor decks. After my visit, I walked out wondering why Dayton Metro Library main branch didn’t also have a rooftop deck. The envy faded in a few days, and it became clear why these libraries are different and why they should be.
Often the solutions for creating long lasting, sustainable solutions to design are viewed as interchangeable, regardless of location and time. For example when cities look to implement more sustainable transportation solutions, they may find protected bike lanes are an effective, low cost solution. However, does that solution work in Cleveland? Similarly, I naively wished for outdoor decks and a solar paneled green roof. I am writing this back in Dayton, on a not so atypical morning that greeted me with brisk 27 degree winds; the fireplace on the second floor of Dayton’s library now feels like a much better way to bring people together than an outdoor deck.
Another aspect that I envied now standout in
a similar way, like the diversity of media available. In the Austin Public
Library there are “listening stations;” like a museum interactive panel, you
can selected a radio station, podcast, or other selected form of audio from the
menu, put on the attached headphones, and settle into the armchair. If you walk
into the Dayton Public Library today, you’re not going to find this feature.
But is that such a bad thing? This is not a piece of the infrastructure, it can
be added, removed, and is a part the experimental design of Austin’s Library
that could easily, in future years, be added to Dayton’s Library. Dayton in the
future may have a “technology petting zoo,” too.
The myriad features present in the Austin
Public Library are stunning and appropriate
for a central branch of a metro library system that serves the 2 million person
metro area of Austin, the capital of Texas. However, we should hope that the
central library of an 800,000 person metro area is very different. The role of each library is as different as
it’s relationship to the space it is in, in terms of community and environment.
As a Daytonian, it would be hard for me to be more proud of the beautiful main
branch of the Dayton Metro Library. As an admirer of great public design, I am
captivated by the Central Austin Public Library. But as a River Steward, I am
left wondering why the connection to the river is lacking in the Dayton’s library
and what can be done to change that. Austin’s
overt efforts to connect to the river through the library creates a sense of shared
identity and responsibility between those on the water, in the library, and
across all public spaces.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.